Parmenides

Description: Please refer to the section BELOW (and NOT ABOVE) this line for the product details - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Title:ParmenidesISBN13:9781500680527ISBN10:1500680524Author:Jowett, Benjamin (Translator), Plato (Author)Description:Parmenides Is One Of The Dialogues Of Plato It Is Widely Considered To Be One Of The More, If Not The Most, Challenging And Enigmatic Of Plato's Dialogues The Parmenides Purports To Be An Account Of A Meeting Between The Two Great Philosophers Of The Eleatic School, Parmenides And Zeno Of Elea, And A Young Socrates The Occasion Of The Meeting Was The Reading By Zeno Of His Treatise Defending Parmenidean Monism Against Those Partisans Of Plurality Who Asserted That Parmenides' Supposition That There Is A One Gives Rise To Intolerable Absurdities And Contradictions The Heart Of The Dialogue Opens With A Challenge By Socrates To The Elder And Revered Parmenides And Zeno Employing His Customary Method Of Attack, The Reductio Ad Absurdum, Zeno Has Argued That If As The Pluralists Say Things Are Many, Then They Will Be Both Like And Unlike; But This Is An Impossible Situation, For Unlike Things Cannot Be Like, Nor Like Things Unlike But This Difficulty Vanishes, Says Socrates, If We Are Prepared To Make The Distinction Between Sensibles On One Hand And Forms, In Which Sensibles Participate, On The Other Thus One And The Same Thing Can Be Both Like And Unlike, Or One And Many, By Participating In The Forms Of Likeness And Unlikeness, Of Unity And Plurality; I Am One Man, And As Such Partake Of The Form Of Unity, But I Also Have Many Parts And In This Respect I Partake Of The Form Of Plurality There Is No Problem In Demonstrating That Sensible Things May Have Opposite Attributes; What Would Cause Consternation, And Earn The Admiration Of Socrates, Would Be If Someone Were To Show That The Forms Themselves Were Capable Of Admitting Contrary Predicates At This Point, Parmenides Takes Over As Socrates' Interlocutor And Dominates The Remainder Of The Dialogue After Establishing That Socrates Himself Has Made The Distinction Between Forms And Sensibles, Parmenides Asks Him What Sorts Of Form He Is Prepared To Recognize Socrates Replies That He Has No Doubt About The Existence Of Mathematical, Ethical And Aesthetic Forms (E G , Unity, Plurality, Goodness, Beauty), But Is Unsure Of Forms Of Man, Fire And Water; He Is Almost Certain, Though Admits To Some Reservations, That Undignified Objects Like Hair, Mud And Dirt Do Not Have Forms Parmenides Suggests That When He Is Older And More Committed To Philosophy, He Will Consider All The Consequences Of His Theory, Even Regarding Seemingly Insignificant Objects Like Hair And Mud For The Remainder Of The First Part Of The Dialogue, Parmenides Draws Socrates Out On Certain Aspects Of The Theory Of Forms And In The Process Brings To Bear Five Arguments Against The Theory Binding:Paperback, PaperbackPublisher:CREATESPACEPublication Date:2014-07-30Weight:0.43 lbsDimensions:0.3'' H x 9.02'' L x 5.98'' WNumber of Pages:140Language:English

Price: 9.34 USD

Location: USA

End Time: 2024-08-22T11:02:25.000Z

Shipping Cost: 0 USD